discdoh wrote:With that said, I personally feel that this whole debacle can be blamed on both sides equally. I was getting extremely tired of my e-mail inbox blowing up with the constant e-mails going back and forth. I had even asked to be removed from the discussion...I just want this thing to be done and over with.
To blame any part of this on me is unfair, disrespectful and irresponsible. I had an idea and brought it to the president of this (not-for-profit) club for support and to help raise awareness of the program. Then, he steals my idea and tries to turn it into a revenue stream. So, I stand up against him because he wants to gouge our members that already fund everything this club does anyway, and I'm the bad guy? How does that make any sense? It's almost like he felt I was taking money out of his own pocket.
I'm sure Chris would say that I'm a PIA because I was fighting for the interests of the members and our courses. But isn't that what the elected board is actually in place to do? Wrong is wrong and I can admit when I am wrong, but this time I am not the one that is wrong! The funny thing is that everyone seemed to agree with me (individually) Greg, Dave W, Mark K, Mark D - even Dave Mac and I saw eye to eye on this!) all told me that they agreed with me.
Everything seemed to be moving the right direction, but took a turn for the worse. I still don't understand how this is my fault. I designed the program and tried to keep Chris from ripping off the membership and I get cut out of the loop?
I want to point out that the new signs are commercial grade aluminum and would last longer than 5 years, but the "initial sponsorship is a 2 year period" so that the RCF can rip you off again in another 2 years and make you pay a renewal fee. Stand up against nor-for=profit greed and do not waste your hard earned money!